
WAR
CRIMINAL n.
A person commiting any of
various crimes,
such as genocide or the mistreatment of
prisoners of war, committed during a war
and considered in violation of the conventions
of warfare.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I
believe there were only two groups that the
average Bush
voter could fit into.....
- The stupid,
ignorant misinformed goose category(or)
- The
well-off, greedy, materialistic heel
group
(If
you voted for Bush and do not belong to either of
these assemblies, then you must be an alien from
another planet, because the Bush Bunch certainly
didn't conceal their true nature.)
)
I
just came across this little quiz (I
know too late) but sadly, it
sure reinforces my theory about the Bush voter.
Carolyn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
The
5 Question Bush/Kerry Election Quiz
Not sure who to vote for? We can help! (snarkcake) Just write TRUE or
FALSE next to each of the sentences below.
1)
______
My family makes more than $200,000 a year (the
top 1%).
2)_______ A member of my family works for / are a
major stockholder in one of the following
businesses: big media, defense, oil/energy, or
any company that has received a no-bid contract
in Iraq.
3) _______ I think Al Queda has been neutralized
as a threat to the United States because since
9/11 we have done everything we can to fight
them.
4) ______ I think that record deficits (debt),
high unemployment and creeping inflation are
signs of a strong, well-managed economy.
5) ______ I believe George W. Bush showed
excellent leadership by invading Iraq and he has
communicated a clear plan for Iraqs future
and Americas military deployed there.
Now
add up your answers. ____ True ____ False
If you answered most questions TRUE, then you should
vote for George W. Bush. You are one of the lucky
few benefiting from his policies.
If you answered most questions FALSE, then you should
vote for John Kerry. You should look after your
own best interests. George W. Bush sure
isnt.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here is another wonderful Mark
Morford reality article...
I have inserted the Pictures to make his words
even
more meaningful.
(if that's possible)
Carolyn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Very,
Very Dirty Pictures
You want explicit? You want raw and uncensored
and
free of media bias? Here you go
- By
Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
Friday, December 3, 2004
This is what you won't see in the
paper.
This is what you won't
see on CNN or on MSNBC or CBS News or on any
major media Web site anywhere and especially no
goddamn way ever in hell will you see it within a
thousand miles of Fox News.
You aren't supposed to
see. You aren't supposed to know. You are to
remain ignorant and shielded, and, if you're like
most Americans, you have been very carefully
conditioned to think Bush's nasty Iraq war is
merely this ugly little firecracker-like thing
happening way, way over there, carefully
orchestrated and somewhat messy and maybe a
little bloody but mostly still patriotic and good
and necessary and sponsored by none other than
God his own angry Republican self.
And hence you and I both
have no real idea what the hell goes on in Iraq,
no real images to gnaw on and be deeply horrified
and saddened by, except for maybe a tiny handful
of carefully sanitized snapshots of bombed-out
Iraqi cities and maybe some grainy video of U.S.
soldiers enjoying a dusty game of pickup football
and a turkey dinner at the posh military digs
way, way outside of Baghdad.
Or maybe you think war
is manly and heroic and cool, as exemplified by
that now-famous shot of that macho
"Dogface" Marlboro-smokin'
Marine
whose dirt-encrusted mug was eagerly picked up by
newspapers and media Web sites across the nation
(including this one), and he became an instant
icon for the war and the military was positively
giddy about using him an ideal recruitment tool,
a model of how to make soldiers look all studly
and rugged and badass as opposed to the often
poorly educated, disposable hunks of politically
abused postpubescent meat BushCo considers them
to be.

So then. Here is your
uncensored truth: fallujahinpictures.com. Real
pictures from Fallujah. Real pictures of war.
Brutal and explicit and shocking and just one
site of many. Be warned: this is very graphic
content. Horrific and deeply disturbing. No
censorship. No suppression. No Photoshop. No
bogus shots of happy Iraqi children running in
the streets begging for candy from American
soldiers. No night shots of Marines in bitchin'
night-vision goggles bustin' down the door of
some palace and then cheering.
Because if you think
that's what it's all been about, if you really
think war is just this tragic but necessary evil
that contains some unfortunate violence and
regrettable death but is nonetheless still full
of righteous democratic American truth, you have
been wildly misled and deeply deceived and might
want to consider a nice intellectual emetic. You
and Dubya both.
EMETIC An agent that
causes vomiting .
Mind you, fallujahinpictures.com is not all gross-out shots of
imploded skulls or severed limbs or brutally
decapitated children or mutilated women or
splattered brains or rivers of blood and
intestine and excrement lining the Iraqi streets.
Those horrific photos are indeed available (just
Google "Iraq
war pictures"). But, really, who wants
to see that? Not Dubya, that's who. Besides,
that's what slasher movies are for. Republicans
and war hawks don't actually want to see that
stuff in, you know, real life.

And maybe you already
know that our government instituted an
unqualified ban on pictures of all those
flag-draped U.S. coffins that are pouring into
American Air Force bases by the hundreds. Maybe
you remember that cargo worker who lost her job
last spring for leaking
such photos to The Seattle Times.

Maybe you know how
back in June the Republican-led Congress upheld
the ban on coffin photos, all under the guise of
"respecting soldiers' families," which
of course translates directly into "If the
pubic saw all those kids coming home dead, they
might not wave that flag so wildly."
As the saying goes, Bush
may be dumb, but he ain't always stupid. Even he
doubtlessly remembers the effect of watching TV
in the '60s and seeing all those American kids
coming home from Vietnam in body bags. Not
exactly good for morale back home. Not exactly
good for the country's view of itself. And true
poison to the pseudo-noble idea of just what the
hell it is we think we're doing by launching such
brutal and unwinnable wars in the first place.
Make no mistake, the
government knows the power of the photo. Words,
it's not so worried about. After all, you can
read the war descriptions and you can check the
appalling U.S. death stats and you can scour the
dour headlines and still most of us just shrug
our shoulders and say gosh that sounds bad and
get on with our day.
But much like that other
"un-American" site, sorryeverybody.com, exemplifies so beautifully (in
a wholly different but no less effective way),
sometimes words just aren't enough. You need to
see it. You need to feel it. Visceral and
human and deep.
Funny thing is, many
right-wing neocons consider the act of displaying
such pictures unpatriotic, even traitorous. As if
revealing the true horrors of war somehow
disrespects our long-suffering soldiers, somehow
harms them by depicting the full violence of what
they must endure for Bush's snide and viciously
isolationist policies. You think soldiers don't
want the folks back home to know what they have
to deal with? You think they want you numb to the
truth of war and pain and death? Guess again.
Maybe this should be the
rule: If you can't handle seeing what really goes
on in a war, maybe you don't deserve to support
it. If you can't stomach the truths of what our
soldiers are doing and how brutally and bloodily
they're dying and in just what manner they have
to kill those innocent Iraqi civilians in the
name of BushCo's desperate lurch toward greed and
power and Iraqi oil fields and empire, maybe you
don't have the right to stick that little flag on
your oil-sucking SUV. Clear enough?
The major media, by the
way, is often hamstrung and torn. They can rarely
run such photos. Newspapers and TV are hemmed in
by "no-sensationalism" policies and are
often paralyzed by the notion that if they ran
such pictures, they would be called insensitive
or inflammatory or anti-Bush and advertisers and
readers alike would run away in droves. After
all, most readers just aren't keen on seeing
gross-out pics of 19-year-old kids from Kentucky
with massive bleeding head traumas. It just
totally ruins "Garfield."
You have to seek the
facts yourself. You have to dare yourself to
click, to take it in, to see if you can, in fact,
handle the truth.
It is not easy. It is
definitely not pleasant. But in this time of ever
escalating numbers of war dead and flagrant
BushCo lies and sanitized BS about the real
effects of war, all coupled with a simmering plan
to attack Iran and maybe North Korea someday real
soon, seeking out such visceral truth is no
longer just optional. It is, perhaps, the most
patriotic thing you can do.
Click Here for more Mark
Morford on connection.com
Click Here for Mark
Morford New Year's Resolutions
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Thoughts for the author?
E-mail him. I did!
Dear Wonderful Mark,
I just wanted to let you know that I am a
dedicated and loyal fan of yours (not that you
give a flying leap). I've cried, laughed,
blushed, split my spleen and have said on
occasion MERCY after reading one of your
articles! You sure know how to make words induce
emotion (positive and negative) and for that
I am-a-thankin-ya.
I have never emailed you before, knowing you
don't have much time to listen to my feelings
(just another, everybody's got one, opinion) but
your last essay "Very,
Very Dirty Pictures
You want explicit? You want raw and uncensored
and
free of media bias? Here you go "
was so moving I just had to let you know... For
all of us somewhat rational, thinking people
(what a curse) you are the best... THERE I'VE
SAID IT... and I don't care if you don't care!
Thank you, Mark!
Carolyn "a
blue" from
Florida
Mark's column archives
are here
Mark Morford's Notes
& Errata column appears every Wednesday and
Friday on SF Gate, unless it appears on Tuesdays
and Thursdays, which it never does. Subscribe to
this column at sfgate.com/newsletters.
_______________
Dear
World: Sorry About Bush
No, seriously. Very, very sorry. How sorry?
Well, let America show you ... in pictures
By Mark Morford, SF Gate Columnist
Wednesday, November 17, 2004
It's a movement. It's a phenomenon. It's a Web
site. Or maybe it's far more than that. No one
can really be sure.
No matter what it is, it's called
sorryeverybody.com and it expresses, better than
any outpouring so far, a sentiment that's
omnipresent and palpable and still going strong,
and every single Democrat and every single Kerry
supporter and every single liberal of any stripe
whatsoever probably felt it like a white-hot stab
in the heart the minute Kerry's concession speech
hit the airwaves and it undoubtedly went
something like this:
Dear world: We are so very, very sorry. For Bush.
For our bitterly divided and confused nation. For
what's to come. Please know that tens of millions
of us did not vote for him. Please do not hate
us. Not all of us, anyway. OK, maybe Utah. Do you
know where Utah is? Never mind.
See, not only is half of America still deeply
dejected about the onslaught of Dubya Dubya II,
but much of that half wants the world to know
just how crestfallen we are, and just how awful
we feel for inflicting Bush and his middle-finger
foreign policy on them like a virus, a toxin, a
nasty STD, yet again.
After all, we knew this wasn't no ordinary
election. We knew how much was at stake, how this
one represented a sea change in global attitudes,
a dramatic upheaval and reversal of long-standing
American ideas of cooperation and defense and
restraint, ideas that BushCo has now mutated into
a hollow, kill-'em-all faux-cowboy maverick
attitude, an almost irreversible shift, mostly
backward. Or downward.
But here's the genius part. Beyond e-mail, beyond
blogs or radio shows or despondent letters to the
editor or overly verbose progressively insulated
Left Coast columnists who avoid excessive
punctuation as they type because it might spill
their scotch, sorryeverybody.com nails the
sentiment in a way no one could have imagined: in
photographs.
Or, rather, thousands of photographs. Of people.
Ordinary people, grainy and crooked and funny and
amateurish and honest and full of pathos and raw
emotion and wry humor and surprising beauty and
you want that connecting thread? That thing that
unifies and makes you feel less alone and that
helps you locate yourself in a country gone mad
and lost and regressive? You can do no better
than this.
And so far the site carries nearly 5,000 photos,
with an apparent backlog of over 1,000 more ready
to be uploaded and new ones coming in faster than
the site's diverse gaggle of stunned creators --
namely, a sly neuroscience student from USC named
James and his ragtag team of webmasters and
designers from across the country -- ever
dreamed. And the reaction has been, to put it
mildly, overwhelming: a whopping 50 million hits
to the site so far, moving nearly two terabytes
of information. And growing fast.
And if a picture's worth a thousand words, then
sorryeverybody.com is exploding with a few
million very ardent expressions indeed, all
echoing the same simple but heartbreaking
sentiment and all, presumably, posted in the hope
that the message will be somehow reach the
eyeballs of the world, the countries so very and
rightfully appalled and revolted by our apparent
lack of vision.
It seems to be working. Pictures are apparently
flooding into the site from around the world,
full of messages of "It's OK" and
"Thanks for trying" and "Just
don't let it happen again" and it's even
spawned a European response page called
apologiesaccepted.com and this is when it hits
you: this little gag site, unexpectedly,
wonderfully, with its beautifully simple concept,
might have actually stumbled on a way to do the
impossible: it might just help heal our decimated
international relationships and, quite possibly,
do more for world diplomacy that Bush ever could,
or ever will.
Is that taking things a bit far? Not really. Sure
the site's cute. Sure it's a bit of a novelty.
But it's also illuminating and deeply moving and
50 million hits in under two weeks is nothing
short of staggering, and hence the creators are
receiving reams of hate mail from the BushCo
Right of sufficient vehemence and vitriol that
it's even spawned a creepy 'n' crude "We're
Not Sorry" countersite, with its handful of
disturbing pics of rabid right-wingers displaying
their, uh, raging pro-Bush myopia. So you know
James and Co. are onto something.
After all, sorryeverybody.com has broken the
cardinal rule of Bush's bitter neocon agenda: no
matter what the atrocity, no matter the how
grossly botched the war or how insidious the WMD
lie or how debilitating the world-record deficit
or how brutal the attack on the environment, if
there's one thing the GOP simply does not do,
it's apologize.
But this is what makes sorryeverybody.com so
incredibly effective. It does what no column and
no punditry and no news analysis and no
Democratic weeping can possibly do, what the
Kerry campaign failed to do, what no amount of
verbal raging into the Void can manage: it puts a
human face on the sadness.
A very real face, families and children,
teenagers and the elderly, young couples and
homosexuals and many, many disaffected liberal
loners who are stuck like sad beacons way out in
the middle of the red states and who desperately
want the world to know they exist, that they're
Americans, too, that they did their best to get
the Smirking One out.
What's more, the pics, generally speaking, aren't
raunchy. They aren't gross or hateful or puerile
or full of screaming middle fingers or manly gun
collections or people holding large kitchen
knives or butane lighters up to Bush dolls in
effigy.
They're just snapshots, candid and intimate and
expressive and unretouched and often rather
beautiful, taken in the living rooms and
backyards and bedrooms and small towns of the
country.
It's just people. It's just America.
"Real" America. An enormous and
enormously saddened half of this amazing country
that's trying to reach out to the rest of the
world and get the word out and mend its broken
heart like at no other time in our generation's
history. It's an expression of regret for what's
been lost, for what we once were, for what we had
hoped to become again but that has now been,
well, at best delayed, at worst bludgeoned into a
blind stupor.
The site proves that countless Americans still
not only care enough to apologize for our
country's massive errors of judgment, for our
blind mistakes, but also are concerned about the
effect those mistakes will have on others. As
such, these pictures are perhaps the finest and
most honest expressions of love for one's country
you can find. And if that's not patriotic,
nothing is.
WWW.SORRYEVERYBODY.COM
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Margaret
Mead's words are truer
today than ever before!
"Never
doubt that a small group of thoughtful committed
citizens can change the world. Indeed it's
the only thing that ever has." Margaret Mead
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
carolynconnection has obtained a
theme song
Only a portion of song will download,
You can download whole song here

"Unamerican"
by Ian
Rhett
Ian Rhett is another Bob Dylan.
The
Words To Unamerican
v.1
Didn't know I was unamerican
For choosing to give a damn
Or unpatriotic
For daring to take a stand
For what I believe in
Looks like Freedom to me -
Expressions of Liberty
Wanting our America to be
A responsible hegemony
v.2
Didn't know I was a communist
For wanting to share the wealth
It doesn't take an economist
To measure the cost of health
And what I believe in
Looks like heaven to me -
One Human Family
Where everybody's got enough to eat
And something warm to cover their feet
v.3
Didn't know I'd be labeled a terrorist
For daring to speak my mind
It's becoming more precarious
For failing to tow the line
And what I believe in
Sounds like Freedom to me -
Like the Sons of Liberty
In 1773
Dumping 45 tons of tea
v.4
Didn't know I was in the minority
Of people who love the Earth
I hope it becomes a priority
Before it gets any worse
And what I Believe In
Looks like heaven to me -
Where Angels take the shape of the tree
Giving us clean air to breathe
From the rivers to the mountains and seas...
v.5
Didn't know I hated my country
For acknowledging the Truth
This war is dispicable profiteering
At the expense of our youth
And what I Believe In
Looks like heaven to me
All of humanity
Living as community
In relative harmony
I know it's just a song
But if the whole world sang along
How
much longer would it be this way?
his work is ©2004 Ian Rhett and
licensed
under a Creative
Commons License
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Every
daring attempt to make a great change
in existing conditions, every lofty vision of new
possibilities for the human race, has been
labeled Utopian.
Idealists
foolish enough to throw caution to the
winds have advanced mankind and have enriched the
world.
Emma
Goldman
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Here's an
idea, we progressives should take a lesson from
the protesters behind the democratic "orange
revolution" in
the Ukraine.
START DYING OUR HAIR BLUE, WEAR A BLUE TIE AND
LET US CALL IT THE BLUE REVOLUTION! I can
dream can't I, maybe a dream that could come
true... Carolyn
PS: Here's a
start: CHOOSE THE BLUE
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OP-ED
COLUMNIST
Let
My People Go
By NICHOLAS D.
KRISTOF Published: December 4, 2004
---
Columnist Page:
Nicholas D. Kristof
Kristof Responds: The
Columnist Addresses
Readers' E-mail E-mail:
nicholas@nytimes.com
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

IN
HARD-LUCK MINING REGION, YANUKOVYCH WINS LOYALTY
FOR PROVIDING MODEST, YET STABLE, SALARIES AND
PENSIONS
ORANGE
UKRAINE
KIEV,
Ukraine
Here's a suggestion for President Bush from the
protesters behind the democratic "orange
revolution" here:
Orange
is said to be the favourite colour of Mr
Yushchenko because it reminds him of the sunrise
over the Carpathian Mountains. Sources close to
the opposition leader said the Western-leaning
economist was genuinely surprised that so many
people came out to support him.
Wear an
orange tie. "If he wore an orange
tie, people here would be crying," said Yuri
Maluta, a protester from Lviv. "It would
show that the American president supports
democracy here."
The request
says something about the lighthearted and
pro-American spirit on the streets. Since my
father grew up in what is now southwestern
Ukraine, I decided to come here to join my people
- and I found that waging revolution has rarely
been such fun.
Young
people enveloped in orange scarves, hats and
ribbons alternately chant slogans for freedom,
boogie to rock music, eat oranges, warm up and
flirt at McDonald's, and disappear into their
downtown "tent city" to make love, not
war.
The
protest organizers have placed gorgeous young
women in the vanguard of confrontations with
troops, so the troops will be too dazzled to club
them.
Most
Ukrainians love the U.S., and to be an American
here - any American - is to be a rock star.
Protesters overhear me speaking English and line
up to ask me to autograph their orange ribbons
with a big "U.S.A."
Yet for all
the giddiness among the protesters here,
particularly after the Supreme Court's landmark
ruling in their favor yesterday, this is as much
about Russia as it is about Ukraine. And the
first thing to say is that Vladimir Putin has
behaved utterly disgracefully.
Mr.
Putin seems to regard the Ukrainians as Russia's
serfs, bound to obey the will of their master.
Mr. Putin was a co-conspirator with Ukraine's
outgoing president, Leonid Kuchma, to tilt the
campaign and fix the election in favor of the
pro-Moscow candidate, Viktor Yanukovich, whose
criminal history (he served almost four years for
robbery and assault as a young man) would make
him a fine Putin stooge.
Mr.
Putin visited Ukraine twice during the campaign
to help Mr. Yanukovich, used the Russian news
media to promote him and then congratulated him
publicly before the results of the stolen
election had even been completely counted.
President Bush and other Western leaders need to
make it clear to Mr. Putin that he has no right
to extend his quasi dictatorship to other
peoples.
Sure, it's
traumatic for the Russians to have seen their
country sink from a superpower to a third-rate
economy whose old colonies are now busy joining
NATO. But Mr. Putin has undermined Russian
democracy, brutalized Chechnya and barely helped
in curbing weapons of mass destruction. We don't
need to be so solicitous of such a bully.
I
was among the crowds in Independence Square when
images of Mr. Putin were shown on the huge
screens. The crowd yelled a deafening
"boo." We should be joining in.
Colin Powell strongly denounced the rigged
election, and Ukrainians will remember that
American support with gratitude for a long time
to come. But Mr. Bush and the White House haven't
been as outspoken as either Mr. Powell or the
Europeans, and that's a mistake. Mr. Bush is
working through the Europeans, and especially the
Poles, to achieve a solution, and he may fear
that too public an American role would anger the
Russians and revive the cold war. Those are fair
concerns.
But
this is the moment of truth for Ukraine, when Mr.
Putin is trying to thwart the challenger, Viktor
Yushchenko, by squelching a democratic election,
and we need to stand foursquare with the
democrats.
"Bush has to push more strongly and
decisively on Ukraine to be democratic,"
said Bogdan Prysyazhnyuk, a young lawyer who is
backing the orange revolution.
"The Europeans are doing something, much
more than Bush is," noted Natalya Slobodyan,
a journalism student who, like many young women,
has dyed her hair orange. That's a common view on
the street, where the Europeans are seen as
standing up to Mr. Putin. Mr. Bush's
behind-the-scenes role is less appreciated.
I'm
glad that Europe is finally getting its act
together, after bungling the breakup of
Yugoslavia in the 1990's and studiously ignoring
the catastrophe in Darfur this year. But when a
historic tide is running in our favor, our
president should be riding it at least abreast of
the Europeans, not cheering them from the shore.
Or
he might at least choose an orange tie.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Fat chance of that...
Bush will never wear an
Orange
tie just like he would never wear a
Blue
(for
progression and peace) tie. Carolyn
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Please Join
Welcome
to Democracy Corps
Click
Below If You Dare
Scary
Picture
came true
|