I doubt it. Today's Delancey's Place Tidbit, gives a brief encounter of what happened when the US Government "forced" a whole nation to go dry. What followed was a horrific scene of "forced" drunkenness, "forced" crime and "forced" misery... Today's Government "forced" War on Drugs has produced similar anguish especially for those who seek marijuana to relieve pain and suffering. Not to mention, if this so-called Governmental War on Drugs would lax some of its absurdities, the revenue collected from such sales would help the sinking economy. But it is not about a failing policy, it's all about politics and getting elected. Common sense, must take a back seat once again. Stupidity continues to rule, as time marches on! thinkingblue
Delancey Place's Today's Tidbit
In today's encore excerpt--the U.S. outlaws the manufacture, transport, and
sale of
alcoholic beverages under the
Volstead Act (1920-1933), more commonly called Prohibition. Against
expectations, Prohibition resulted in even greater levels of alcohol consumption
in America and it was repealed in 1933. The backlash that led to Prohibition
extended to other areas as well, including banning highly suggestive language
such as "the cat's meow":
"When, at the stroke of New Year 1920, the U.S. formally went 'dry,' most
revelers would have only experienced the dull ache of their hangovers. It was
only as time went by that the realization sunk in of how profoundly Prohibition
had altered American life. It would be 1925 before Variety would note
that Times Square--between 34th and 52nd streets--boasted 2,500 speakeasies,
where before Prohibition there had been only 300 saloons. In the entire country,
in 1925, there were estimated to be three million 'booze joints,' where
'pre-Prohibition cafes numbered 177,000.' In other words, a nation of moderate
drinkers was turned into a nation of obsessive alcoholics, paying for criminals
to build up an immense black market that would affect the nation's economy for
decades (and continues to do so in the drug age). There would be fun, gaiety,
abandon, dancing, hot-cha-cha, cheers and laughter, and buzzing joints like the
Cotton Club and
Texas Guinan's cabarets, but also killings, sickness, fraud, repression
and the corruption of states and city halls. ...
"The moral guardians, however, continued their march, moving in, as King Booze
leered over the city, on 'suggestive' performances and sexual innuendo. In
February 1921, the Music Publisher's Protective Association began a
'housecleaning' campaign aimed at banishing 'all 'blue' and double-meaning
lyrics' from the market, [stating] all 'indecent material, or songs that are
capable of indecent construction' should be banned. ...
Vaudeville shows were to be vigorously cleaned up too, 'the latitude
allowed shimmy and jazz dancers' was to be curtailed. ...
Current slang, like
'Hot
Dog,'
'The
Cat's Meow,'
'Cat's
Pajamas' and
'Hot Cat,'
was also on the proscribed list."
Simon Louvish, Mae West, St. Martin's Press, Copyright 2005 by
Simon Louvish, pp. 82-83.
When will the US government ever learn from the past?
Let's keep our heads, while we continue to watch THE THEATER OF THE
ABSURD!!!
YOU CAN BEAM ME UP NOW, SCOTTIE.
Thinkingblue