The Two Serious Reasons To Vote For Obama
World War 3 and An Unenlightened, Repressive Supreme Court
Read More Here: http://news.yahoo.com/50-years-cuban-missile-crisis-closer-thought-world-153411641--politics.html
IF YOU THINK IT DOESN'T MATTER WHO IS ELECTED... THINK AGAIN.
Number one reason to vote for Obama: A Romney administration would culminate in war. It wouldnt take much to spark an all out cataclysmic event where many human beings will suffer and die. That is the nature of Romney, who is aware that all his riches will keep he and his family safe somewhere during war, while the rest of us endure the abject misery of world conflict. A Romney win would be a Jackpot for the neocons (who have been waiting patiently in the shadows after their last total failure, to try, try again.) just like 9/11 was a win for them in abstract. (Read: Neocons pushed mindless Bush into idiotic war Chris Matthews http://mondoweiss.net/2012/08/neocons-pushed-mindless-bush-into-idiotic-war-chris-matthews.html)
Romney represents to the neoconservative ideology, a puppet, just like George W. Bush did. They can and will bend him shape him to fulfill their dream of whipping the world nations, who they believe to be adolescent and infantile in their governing and a threat to the world, into shape or bring them into adulthood, which they believe their credo or ideology to be. Too simple for you, just remember it was the PNAC who penned the words "A NEW PEARL HARBOR":
The Project for the New American Century (PNAC) was an American think tank based in Washington, D.C. that lasted from 1997 to 2006. It was co-founded as a non-profit educational organization by William Kristol and Robert Kagan. The PNAC's stated goal was "to promote American global leadership." Fundamental to the PNAC were the view that "American leadership is both good for America and good for the world" and support for "a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity." The PNAC exerted influence on high-level U.S. government officials in the administration of U.S. President George W. Bush and affected the Bush Administration's development of military and foreign policies, especially involving national security and the Iraq War.
"New Pearl Harbor"
Section V of Rebuilding America's Defenses, entitled "Creating Tomorrow's Dominant Force", includes the sentence: "Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing eventlike a new Pearl Harbor".
Though not arguing that Bush administration PNAC members were complicit in those attacks, other social critics such as commentator Manuel Valenzuela and journalist Mark Danner, investigative journalist John Pilger, in New Statesman, and former editor of The San Francisco Chronicle Bernard Weiner, in CounterPunch, all argue that PNAC members used the events of 9/11 as the "Pearl Harbor" that they neededthat is, as an "opportunity" to "capitalize on" (in Pilger's words), in order to enact long-desired plans.
Inexperienced in realities of war
Former US Congressman Lionel Van Deerlin and UK Labour MP and Father of the House of Commons, Tam Dalyell, criticized PNAC members for promoting policies which support an idealized version of war, even though only a handful of PNAC members have served in the military or, if they served, never seen combat.
As quoted in Paul Reynolds' BBC News report, David Rothkopf stated:
Their [The Project for the New American Century's] signal enterprise was the invasion of Iraq and their failure to produce results is clear. Precisely the opposite has happened. The US use of force has been seen as doing wrong and as inflaming a region that has been less than susceptible to democracy. Their plan has fallen on hard times. There were flaws in the conception and horrendously bad execution. The neo-cons have been undone by their own ideas and the incompetence of the Bush administration.
More Here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_for_the_New_American_Century
Number two reason, the fate of the Supreme Court. I have been reiterating to all who may come within earshot of my opinion on this subject for some time now, the importance of an Obama win because of the selection of Supreme Court Judges. Its not about Obama its about Life and how we will get to live it in the future if Romney were to win. AGAIN, THINK ABJECT MISERY, not only by war, but by restriction on freedoms. Especially women because its their body that has become the conservative 'soup de jour' since the Tea Party took control of common sense but it will also affect men, concerning family planning and the enslavement of free will. Romney, without a doubt will select the most rigid (religiosity) minds to don our supreme court, allowing this court to become our moral (one-sided) compass, on how we will be forced to live our lives. Bye, bye separation of Church and State!
Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy
I have been spending much of my time researching my ancestry-line and with a browse that went back to the early 1800s, through all the different unions and begets there was one life common denominator for the women of the past: a marriage almost always resulted in the wife being pregnant most of her adult life. There were no thoughts, public or private about contraception, no choices for a woman concerning her body. A pregnancy was a sentence, an incarceration to a woman of antiquity she could do nothing but endure. Infant mortality was also high, so was the rate of maternal deaths:
Q: Why do so many women still die in pregnancy or childbirth?
A: Every minute, at least one woman dies from complications related to pregnancy or childbirth that means 529 000 women a year. In addition, for every woman who dies in childbirth, around 20 more suffer injury, infection or disease approximately 10 million women each year. More Here: http://www.who.int/features/qa/12/en/index.html
The startling absolutes of a Romney/Ryan win:
Think about it, IT'S NO JOKE! thinkingblue
$$ Mitt Romney Style $$